Major problems with proposed Telecommunications Interception Laws

Fri 13-Jul-2007

EFA has been actively involved during the last four years in efforts by the Parliament to deal with the vexed issue of interception of stored communications (e.g. email), and we have fought to ensure that there is an appropriate balance between protecting the privacy of telecommunications users and meeting legitimate needs for access by security and law enforcement agencies.

The 2007 Bill currently before Parliament includes major new powers for security and law enforcement agencies and significantly changes the existing “telecommunications data” access framework. It contains provisions that were not recommended, nor even mentioned, in the Blunn Report, and some provisions that are contrary to recommendations in the Blunn Report. Furthermore there are a number of technical problems with the drafting of the Bill that would create severe practical problems if implemented. Accordingly, EFA has recommended that this Bill be rejected by the Parliament. A Senate Committee is inquiring into the Bill.

See: EFA’s submission to the Inquiry

Submission on Internet Censorship

Mon 28-May-2007

EFA has made a submission to the Senate Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts Committee Inquiry into the provisions of the Communications Legislation Amendment (Content Services) Bill 2007.

IPND Scheme

Fri 2-Mar-2007

EFA has sent a submission in support of the Australian Communications and Media Authority’s proposed Integrated Public Number Database Scheme which is being established following the enactment of the Telecommunications Amendment (Integrated Public Number Database) Bill 2006.

Draft changes to Telecommunications Privacy Laws

Fri 23-Feb-2007

EFA’s submission to the Attorney-General’s Department expresses serious concerns about the Exposure Draft of Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2007. The draft contains new powers enabling law enforcement agencies to access telecommunications data without a warrant, which were not recommended in the Blunn Review Report, and other provisions that are contrary to some recommendations in the Blunn Report. EFA would be unable to support passage of the proposed legislation in its current form.

See EFA’s submission to the A-G’s Dept.

Access Card Bill seriously deficient

Fri 12-Jan-2007

The exposure draft of an Access Card Bill has exacerbated EFA’s opposition to the system. The broad powers to be granted to the Minister and DHS officers facilitates function creep, negates implied promises about limits on storage of information in the national ID database, and possibly even enables the collection of fingerprints, etc. Proposed offences are seriously deficient: some are unlikely to be enforced due to the nature of criminal law, some would criminalise innocuous activity, and some show DHS has no confidence in the technological security of the card system architecture and enable individuals to be prosecuted for events beyond their control.

See EFA’s submission on the Access Card Exposure Draft Bill.

ALRC Privacy Review

Mon 8-Jan-2007

EFA sent a submission to the Australian Law Reform Commission in response to ALRC Issues Paper 31 Review of Privacy. EFA considers the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) is in need of major overhaul. It is inadquate to protect the privacy of Australians in the 21st century.

See EFA’s submission to the ALRC.

Media Release - Hyperlinking appeal causes concern

Wed 20-Dec-2006

Electronic Frontiers Australia (EFA) today expressed its concern at the decision of the Full Federal Court in the Cooper v Universal Music Pty Ltd appeal. The initial decision in this case held that a Brisbane webmaster, his Internet Service Provider (ISP), a director of the ISP, and a technical support employee of the ISP were liable for ‘authorising’ the infringing activities of users of a website which acted as an index and search engine for MP3 files located elsewhere on the Internet.

Read more … »

Review of .au Internet domain

Tue 28-Nov-2006

EFA sent a submission to the Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts in response to the Discussion Paper Review of the structure and operation of the .au Internet domain, 28 Nov 2006.

See EFA’s submission to the DCITA Review.

Senate Committee Report on Troubling Copyright Bill Welcomed

Tue 14-Nov-2006

A Senate Committee inquiring into the controversial Copyright Amendment Bill 2006 has issued a report recommending changes to the Bill. Electronic Frontiers Australia (EFA) today cautiously welcomed the report of the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee but expressed concern that the Committee did not recommend the criminal provisions be deferred until next year.

Read more … »

Copyright Bill Deeply Flawed

Wed 1-Nov-2006

Nov 2006: EFA has made a written submission to the Senate Committee inquiry into the Copyright Amendment Bill 2006. The Bill, in its current form, contains a deeply flawed and over-broad implementation of the Technical Protection Measures provisions of the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement. The Bill will also introduce new purported rights of time-shifting and format-shifting which are much narrower than those existing in the United States, and contains a raft of new criminal provisions designed to make it easier to criminally prosecute Internet users for copyright infringement. These laws could be applied to children as young as 10 years old, and carry penalties up to 5 years jail.

See EFA’s Submission to the Copyright Amendment Bill Inquiry.

IPND Bill introduced

Thu 19-Oct-2006

The Telecommunications Amendment (Integrated Public Number Database) Bill 2006 was introduced into Federal Parliament. This Bill will improve privacy protection for telephone subscriber information stored in the IPND and will implement a situation substantially similar to that advocated in EFA’s July 2005 submission to the ACMA concerning data sourced from the IPND. Unfortunately however the Government has not addressed the related issue of Sensis’s collection of data directly from telephone service providers, not the IPND. Hence the Bill will not result in adequate regulation, nor result in a level playing field applicable to public directory producers. EFA considers Sensis should be required to comply with the same rules as any other public directory producer.

Telemarketing Standard

Wed 6-Sep-2006

EFA sent a submission in response to the ACMA’s Discussion Paper on an Industry Standard for the Making of Telemarketing Calls. The ACMA is required by the Do Not Call Register Act 2006 to develop a national telemarketing standard to provide consumers with greater certainty regarding the minimum level of behaviour they can expect from unsolicited telemarketing, opinion polling and survey calls (including from entitities exempt from compliance with the Do Not Call Register).

See EFA’s submission to the ACMA and EFA’s Use of Telecommunications Customer Information page.

UnSmart Access Card

Mon 31-Jul-2006

EFA is deeply concerned by the planned rollout of a so-called Access Card smart card linked to a centralised database containing identification, and other, information about almost every adult Australian and Australian residents. The proposal is flawed because it produces a “honeypot effect” - a highly attractive and richly rewarding single target for criminals engaged in identity theft.

See EFA’s submission to the DHS Access Card Consumer and Privacy Taskforce and EFA’s Access Card page.

Do Not Call Register Law Passed

Thu 22-Jun-2006

The Do Not Call Register Act 2006 has now been enacted by Parliament. The Register is expected to commence in the first half of 2007.
On 28 Nov 2005, EFA made a submission in response to the Discussion Paper titled Introduction of an Australian Do Not Call Register issued by the Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts. EFA supports the establishment of a Do Not Call Register. Additional measures are also necessary, including regulations governing the use of automated calling systems and minimum national contact standards.

Labor’s mandatory ISP blocking scheme

Wed 29-Mar-2006

EFA has issued an analysis of Labor’s recently announced scheme. We conclude that mandatory ISP filtering would not be effective in protecting children. PC based filtering remains more effective. Our analysis includes information about why that is so. Kim Beazley appears to have latched onto an ineffective and unworkable proposal issued by The Australia Institute 3 years ago and further promoted by the Family First Party 18 months ago. According to recent research commissioned by the Australian Internet safety advisory body, NetAlert, mandatory ISP filtering would still not be effective in protecting children and would lead to a significant reduction in network performance.

See also:

EFA’s Time Line of Mandatory ISP Filtering Proposals and Religious Right Group’s lobbying campaigns, 2003-2006.

Computer Game Ban Highlights Need For Censorship Reform

Fri 17-Feb-2006

Electronic Frontiers Australia (EFA) today expressed concern over the banning of a computer game dealing with graffiti and called for reform of the Australian censorship regime to bring it into line with community expectations. Under current censorship laws, the highest level rating that a computer game may receive is MA15+ (Mature Accompanied), whereas films may be classified R18+ (Restricted). This means that films deemed suitable only for adults can be legally sold in Australia, whilst computer games of a similar nature will be banned.

Read more … »