EFA Electronic Frontiers Australia
line.gif
 
PO Box 382 North Adelaide SA 5006
Email: secretary@efa.org.au
Phone: 08 9458 2790 Fax: 08 9356 1247
http://www.efa.org.au/
Your volunteer voice on the electronic frontier.
EFA Newsletter - September 1998
 
line.gif
There are good reasons for crypto export controls - if there are no controls there will be anarchy. We can't remove controls from everything because people want to sleep safely in their beds, and that's the environment we're trying to give them ..... as a responsible country that can control its citizens
       Robbie Costmeyer
Director of Strategic Trade Policy and Operations
Department of Defence.
The Australian, July 14, 1998
line.gif

EFA Newsletter, Vol.4 No.3, September 1998  
ISSN 1329-6906  

In This Issue

line.gif

International Crypto Campaign

EFA is currently coordinating an international crypto campaign aimed at seeking a review of the Wassenaar Arrangement, an international arms limitation agreement between 33 countries which is the foundation for most national crypto export control policies.

The campaign has attracted considerable support from organisations and dedicated individuals around the world who support the elimination of repressive controls over encryption software.

An Experts Meeting of Wassenaar representatives will be meeting in Vienna in mid-September 1998. It is believed that the Australian delegation will propose that:

  1. Crypto using 40-bit keys should no longer be controlled (hardly a significant concession!).
  2. The scope of the General Software Note, which excludes shrink wrapped and public domain software from export control, to be narrowed so that crypto software is no longer exempted.
  3. Intangible exports, i.e. via the Internet, be brought under the Wassenaar umbrella. Currently only the US controls the export of intangibles.
The Global Internet Liberty Campaign is supporting the campaign and will soon release a statement to be forwarded to the Wassenaar delegations calling upon them to work to eliminate cryptography controls from the next revision of the Arrangement. When released the statement will be available on the campaign web site.

line.gif

The Australian Crypto Campaign

In July 1998, EFA commenced a campaign aimed at ending current controls over the export of cryptography products and ensuring that no domestic controls over the use of cryptography are introduced. To date, the campaign has focussed on reaching key political leaders. This strategy will be stepped up during the current Federal Election campaign.

Objectives of the campaign are to:

The campaign is supported by the Australian Information Industry Association (AIIA).

As part of the campaign, EFA has released the Australian Crypto FAQ which provides detailed information about Australian cryptography policy.

line.gif

Censors uncertain of their powers

The Acting Chief Censor has informed EFA that the OFLC Classification Board does not know what its powers are and does not intend to find out.

In response to an application for classification of a publication lodged by EFA under Section 13 of the Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Act 1995, the Acting Director of the OFLC, Ms Andree Wright, wrote that the Board "is concerned" that acting on EFA's application "is probably outside the powers conferred on the Classification Board by the Act". Ms Wright also advised that "the Board declines to act on the classification application" unless EFA obtains a Court ruling informing the Board that it has the power to do so. A copy of the OFLC's letter dated 17 July is available at:
      http://www.efa.org.au/Issues/Censor/oflcappl.html

EFA applied for classification of the Full Federal Court judgment in Michael Brown and Others v Classification Review Board (the Rabelais case) in April, following an article in The Age on 28 March 1998. The article reported that it had been suggested by the Australian Government Solicitor and the OFLC that publication of Court judgments could be subject to Australia's censorship laws and that a Federal Court judge might have breached the law by publishing a banned article on shoplifting in a judgment that upheld its banning. Extracts from The Age report are available at:
      http://rene.efa.org.au/censor/rabelais.html#fcpubl

There was an unusual delay of ten days in the Court judgment becoming available from the Federal Court registries and a further six days passed before it was made available to law web sites. While one of the three on-line law sites has made the full judgment available; one has deleted the appendix containing the offending article, and another has not made the judgment available at all.

The apparent uncertainty regarding the reach of censorship laws threatens the rights and freedom of Australians to access case law. Many Court decisions include details of criminal activity which could be seen to "instruct in matters of crime or violence". While the current Board considers that classification of Court judgments is "probably" outside their powers, future Boards may hold a different opinion.

EFA believes the censorship laws in this regard should be clarified and that if the Board is uncertain of their powers and statutory obligations, it would be appropriate for the OFLC to take any necessary action to become properly informed. It is not appropriate for the OFLC to require members of the public, their clients, to obtain a Court ruling to advise the Board of their powers in order to receive service.

EFA has lodged a complaint with the Commonwealth Ombudsman regarding the OFLC's failure to provide either the service paid for or unequivocal advice that acting on EFA's application is outside the powers of the Board.

line.gif

Privacy Submission to Senate Committee

Privacy issues continue to be an important aspect of EFA activity. The Senate Legal and Constitutional References Committee has commenced an inquiry into privacy in the private sector. For details of submissions to the Committee, see the Privacy Campaign page.

line.gif

IIA clarifies intent of Code of Practice

The Internet Industry Association (IIA) has issued a statement clarifying the scope and intent of the IIA Code of Practice. The statement followed a submission from the B'nai B'rith Anti-Defamation Commission calling for ISPs to take on the role of content cops in deciding whether email, web sites, etc, infringe the Racial Discrimination Act and to deny access to users alleged to have contravened same.

The IIA statement says, in part:

For further information see:
  • IAA statement:
          http://www.iia.net.au/news/980702.html

  • B'nai B'rith Anti-Defamation Commission submission:
          http://wej.com.au/adc/articles/internet_report.htm

  • EFA Response to the draft IIA Code:
          http://www.efa.org.au/Publish/coderesp.html

    line.gif

    NOIE commissioned report on Content Blocking

    In January 1998, Senator Alston announced that a consultancy was being established to provide the government with up-to-date advice on technology such as filtering software and blocking devices. During a speech in May 1998, the Senator commented that this would add to their "understanding of the technical means available to internet service providers to block objectionable material when it is brought to their attention..."

    The resulting report Blocking Content On The Internet: A Technical Perspective by the CSIRO's Mathematical and Information Sciences Division was quietly made available on the web site of the National Office for the Information Economy (NOIE) in August.

    Unsurprisingly the authors, after no doubt considerable cost to Australian taxpayers, state "Our conclusion is that content blocking implemented purely by technological means will be ineffective, and neither of the above approaches should be mandated. Any technology-based solution can be worked around - purely as a result of the sheer pace of technology change on the Internet."

    Nevertheless, in Appendix 5 the authors offer "A proposed framework for International Cooperation" which is so incredible as to be laughable. It proposes that ISPs in each country should know the laws of the every other country and prevent material being sent by their system to people in countries where that material is illegal. Apart from the implausibility of ISPs being sufficiently knowledgeable about what content is illegal in other countries, the authors were apparently not aware that censorship laws vary between States, and between States and Territories in Australia. It is also unclear how the authors expect an ISP to know where in Australia an Ozemail user, for example, resides - let alone users in other parts of the world.

    line.gif

    RMIT group report on "Balancing Community Values"

    According to an article in The Age of 11 August, a report released by the RMIT Media and Telecommunications Policy Group on 10 August 1998 claims that "Thousands of Australians were missing out on the benefits of the Internet due to widespread community fear about offensive online material".

    On ABC TV's 7.30 Report on 31 August, the Group's Director, Prof. Mark Armstrong (a former Chair of the ABC) said:

    These claims seem inconsistent with surveys carried out recently by market research company, WWW.Consult, which showed that cost of access is of greater concern to non-users of the Internet (18%), followed by indecent material (15%) and privacy (12%). However, amongst users of the Internet concerns are response times (26%), cost of access (20%), privacy (16%), indecent material (3%).

    Also, an Australian Bureau of Statistics' survey released in August 1998 found that the number of adults who used a home computer once a week or more, and who accessed the Internet in the previous 12 months increased by 37 per cent (to 1.4 million) over February 1998.

    On the 7.30 Report, Senator Alston said:

    EFA agrees with the Senator in this instance and has ordered a copy of the RMIT MTPG Group's report for assessment.

    For further information see:

  • The Age article:
          http://theage.com.au/daily/980811/news/news13.html

  • Executive Summary of the report:
          http://www.rmit.EDU.AU/departments/mtpg/publications/intnet_content/ic_summary.html
          (The full report is not on-line, and the cost of printed copy is $48.)

  • Information on www.consult survey:
          http://www.noie.gov.au/reports/blocking/index.html#_Toc422907829

  • ABS Media Release: Home Internet Use Grows Strongly

    line.gif

    Call for EFA Board nominations

    The Annual General Meeting of Electronic Frontiers Australia (EFA) will be held on Monday 12th October 1998 at 9.00 pm EST on IRC. Further information, including the agenda and details of persons standing for election to the Board, will be sent to members at least 21 days prior to the meeting.

    The positions of Vice-Chair, Treasurer and three ordinary Board Members will become vacant at the AGM. Financial members of EFA are invited to submit nominations for these positions. Self-nomination is acceptable and encouraged.

    In accordance with the rules, the following members of the Board remain in office for 1998/99:
    Chair:Kimberley Heitman
    Secretary:Irene Graham
    Ordinary Board Members:Michael Baker
    Michael Malone
    Jan Whitaker
    In accordance with the rules, the following members of the Board stand down, but are eligible to re-nominate:
    Vice-Chair:Brenda Aynsley
    Treasurer:James Nunn
    Ordinary Board Members:Mark Neely
    Greg Taylor
    Danny Yee
    As well as Board Members, EFA is particularly seeking a person to fulfill the role of Newsletter Editor. The successful person would be co-opted onto the Board, if not already a Board Member. For further information, please contact EFA's Secretary secretary@efa.org.au.

    The closing date for nominations is Monday 14th September 1998, i.e. 28 days prior to the AGM in accordance with the Rules.

    Nominations should be sent to:
        secretary@efa.org.au

    line.gif

    Federal Election and Net Issues

    With the Federal Election now set for October 3, the time is ripe for Net users to make their presence felt. This is the first Australian federal election in which a substantial segment of the Australian population is online.

    EFA will be making representations to the major parties to determine their policies, particularly in relation to:

    We will publish the responses in due course.

    We encourage all Internet users to make their views on these issues known to their local candidates.

    line.gif

    In Brief

    NOIE Strategy Paper
    The National Office for the Information Economy (NOIE) has released a preliminary statement of the government's policy approach entitled Towards an Australian Strategy for the Information Economy. Comments are invited, but must be submitted by 30th September 1998.

    NOIE PKI Report
    NOIE has also released a report entitled Establishment of a National Authentication Authority - A Discussion Paper. Comments on the Discussion Paper were to be provided to NOIE by 7 September 1998. The Report of the National Public Key Infrastructure Working Party (March 1998) is also available from the same URL.

    DES cracker book online
    The recently released EFF publication Cracking DES - Secrets of Encryption Research, Wiretap Politics & Chip Design has been scanned and put online, with EFF's permission of course. Available at:
          http://jya.com/cracking-des.htm

    line.gif

    Why you should become a member of EFA

    How to join

    Membership of EFA costs just $20 per year and for that you get to belong to the premier online civil liberties organisation in Australia; you get issues of the Newsletter on line or in the mail if you have no electronic address, you have the opportunity to contribute to the growth of Electronic Frontiers Australia and volunteer your time and talents in this endeavour. Please consider joining us.

    Membership fees are payable each September and part fees apply to those joining during the year:

    There is also a membership class of Life Member for which the once only fee is $100.00.

    Group Membership is open to associations and groups on the basis of an annual fee of $300 or $0.10 per member, whichever is the greater.

    The form to complete is available online at http://www.efa.org.au/JoinEFA/Welcome.html. The membership form is also mailed automatically to anyone who sends email to efa-info@efa.org.au.

    How to follow EFA activities

    line.gif

    About EFA

    ELECTRONIC FRONTIERS AUSTRALIA INC. is a non-profit national organisation formed in 1994 to promote and defend the civil liberties of users and operators of networked systems. EFA's members are Net and BBS users and other people with a common interest in the digital community, computer mediated communication and online information services. EFA is associated with a number of online civil liberties organisations around the world. 

    EFA's objectives are:

    (a)  To protect and promote the civil liberties of users of computer based communications systems and of those affected by their use.
    (b)  To advocate the amendment of laws and regulations in Australia and elsewhere which restrict free speech and unfettered access to information.
    (c)  To educate the community at large about the social, political, and civil liberties issues involved in the use of computer based communications systems.
    (d)  To support, encourage and advise on the development and use of computer based communication systems, and related innovations.
    (e)  To research and advise on the application of the law (both current and proposed) to computer based communication systems and related technologies.
    Policymakers and media representatives are encouraged to contact EFA for input and comment where relevant.

    On the Internet, you can find more information about EFA at our World Wide Web site, http://www.efa.org.au/, or by sending email to efa-info@efa.org.au.

    line.gif

    Submissions to this newsletter are welcome. Ideas and brief articles for future issues should be sent to editor@efa.org.au.

    © Copyright 1998 Electronic Frontiers Australia Inc.

    Permission is given for redistribution on networks, but distribution via other media is subject to the written permission of the EFA Board.

    -------

     Home Return to EFA Home Page