<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australia opposes treaty to enhance access of blind people to copyright material</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.efa.org.au/2009/05/29/australia-opposes-treaty-to-enhance-access-of-blind-people-to-copyright-material/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.efa.org.au/2009/05/29/australia-opposes-treaty-to-enhance-access-of-blind-people-to-copyright-material/</link>
	<description>Electronic Frontiers Australia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:21:09 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: liemaceseelup</title>
		<link>http://www.efa.org.au/2009/05/29/australia-opposes-treaty-to-enhance-access-of-blind-people-to-copyright-material/comment-page-1/#comment-1327</link>
		<dc:creator>liemaceseelup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 04:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.efa.org.au/?p=572#comment-1327</guid>
		<description>glivitierrupe
&lt;a href=&quot;http://avsjedvvvssk.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bw5f&lt;/a&gt;
Attambwheetle
&lt;a href=&quot;http://avsbkisjk.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;afef&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>glivitierrupe<br />
<a href="http://avsjedvvvssk.com" rel="nofollow">Bw5f</a><br />
Attambwheetle<br />
<a href="http://avsbkisjk.com" rel="nofollow">afef</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry</title>
		<link>http://www.efa.org.au/2009/05/29/australia-opposes-treaty-to-enhance-access-of-blind-people-to-copyright-material/comment-page-1/#comment-1178</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.efa.org.au/?p=572#comment-1178</guid>
		<description>I completely agree Ricky. I can&#039;t even be certain that print disabled is generic enough to cover everybody that could need an exemption.

On the other side of things, I also think that the infringement should only be allowable if no reasonable alternative, which provides a similar level of convince, is available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree Ricky. I can&#8217;t even be certain that print disabled is generic enough to cover everybody that could need an exemption.</p>
<p>On the other side of things, I also think that the infringement should only be allowable if no reasonable alternative, which provides a similar level of convince, is available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Buchanan</title>
		<link>http://www.efa.org.au/2009/05/29/australia-opposes-treaty-to-enhance-access-of-blind-people-to-copyright-material/comment-page-1/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Buchanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.efa.org.au/?p=572#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>After careful reading it turns out that draft treaty ONLY includes blind people. It does NOT include other print disabled people such as those unable to physically hold a book, or those with severe dyslexic like syndromes who can&#039;t read because of their specific learning disability.

There are five print disabled people in my family, including myself, and I&#039;ve been on the information access committee for Vision Australia and I have to say I wouldn&#039;t want that to be passe &quot;as is&quot;. If they amended every place it says &quot;blind&quot; or &quot;vision impaired&quot; to say &quot;print disabled&quot; and made sure the definition of &quot;print disabled&quot; was essentially the same as the one currently in use in Australian copyright law (which does include sighted print disabled as described above) then I would support it but I wouldn&#039;t support the current draft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After careful reading it turns out that draft treaty ONLY includes blind people. It does NOT include other print disabled people such as those unable to physically hold a book, or those with severe dyslexic like syndromes who can&#8217;t read because of their specific learning disability.</p>
<p>There are five print disabled people in my family, including myself, and I&#8217;ve been on the information access committee for Vision Australia and I have to say I wouldn&#8217;t want that to be passe &#8220;as is&#8221;. If they amended every place it says &#8220;blind&#8221; or &#8220;vision impaired&#8221; to say &#8220;print disabled&#8221; and made sure the definition of &#8220;print disabled&#8221; was essentially the same as the one currently in use in Australian copyright law (which does include sighted print disabled as described above) then I would support it but I wouldn&#8217;t support the current draft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Whitaker</title>
		<link>http://www.efa.org.au/2009/05/29/australia-opposes-treaty-to-enhance-access-of-blind-people-to-copyright-material/comment-page-1/#comment-1142</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Whitaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 04:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.efa.org.au/?p=572#comment-1142</guid>
		<description>Consider sending a letter to Bill Shorten, Parliamentary Secretary for Disabilities and Children&#039;s Services. He has a webform on his main APH webpage: http://www.aph.gov.au/house/members/member.asp?id=ATG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider sending a letter to Bill Shorten, Parliamentary Secretary for Disabilities and Children&#8217;s Services. He has a webform on his main APH webpage: <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/house/members/member.asp?id=ATG" rel="nofollow">http://www.aph.gov.au/house/members/member.asp?id=ATG</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creative Commons Through the Looking Glass &#187; Proposed WIPO Exceptions for disability illustrate the copyright divide</title>
		<link>http://www.efa.org.au/2009/05/29/australia-opposes-treaty-to-enhance-access-of-blind-people-to-copyright-material/comment-page-1/#comment-1132</link>
		<dc:creator>Creative Commons Through the Looking Glass &#187; Proposed WIPO Exceptions for disability illustrate the copyright divide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 06:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.efa.org.au/?p=572#comment-1132</guid>
		<description>[...] over the head with copyright. As such, I encourage support of the Electronic Frontiers Australia campaign to raise awareness of the issues in Australia and get it on the agenda of the Copyright Law Branch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over the head with copyright. As such, I encourage support of the Electronic Frontiers Australia campaign to raise awareness of the issues in Australia and get it on the agenda of the Copyright Law Branch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
