Comments on: Conroy faces the filtering music on Q&A

By: Songs

Songs — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:20:12 +0000

Conroy was simply out of control if you ask me.

By: Music Videos

Music Videos — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:53:01 +0000

Great Post. Does anyone know if there is a legal way I can display this content on my own website- thanks

By: synack

synack — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:33:28 +0000

at least he (Conroy) hasn’t heard about VPNs, ssh tunnels and proxy servers

By: mary

mary — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:43:21 +0000

Not to mention the blatant hypocrisy of Kevin Rudd with the labeling of artistic nude photo’s in that Sydney gallery last year as “pornography”, followed by his implementing a trial run of a full naked body revealing security screen at Melbourne airport !!!
I can’t understand why this obvious contradiction hasn’t been jumped on by one and all.
What about all those kids walking through that Screen ?!
Your mother, your grandmother,your wife exposed to any Tom , Dick or Harry ?
What morality/ethics test is done on those at the desk doing the screening ?
Who is asking him to “please explain” ?!
Wake up Australia before you lose the aussie way of life.
Sorry to wander off topic , but it’s not really ,all chapters in the same NWO handbook.
Where Howard left off , Rudd picked up it would seem.

By: JimmyRibbitt

JimmyRibbitt — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:31:41 +0000

Believe it or not, the Australian filtering plan first became well known last year when Alex Jones published an article about it on his Infowars site. I check his site often, becuase he may publish information about net censorship, before anyone else.

By: Mark

Mark — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:22:29 +0000

Not odd that Bolt and Conroy should appear side by side on this issue. Politics 101 – the left/right wing totalitarian scale is not a straight line with a middle and two distant ends, but a ‘key ring’ with a middle and two ends that are opposite but sit next to each other. The perfect real world example

By: Gerry

Gerry — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:09:21 +0000

Pathetic! At the six minute mark (which was when I gave up on the farce for a debate) it was obvious that they had nobody of a technical background who would even be capable of debating the topic with Conroy.

By: Dan

Dan — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 04:31:01 +0000

Steven Conroy was made a joke of last night! At one point nearly the whole audience was laughing at him!
This ridiculous censorship had better be defeated in parliament. If i wanted to live in China i would bloody move there!

By: Asmodai

Asmodai — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:24:27 +0000

Spot on article, well said.

By: John S. Wilkins

John S. Wilkins — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:23:17 +0000

Am I the only person who thinks it odd that a Labor minister’s ally is Andre Bolt!? I was very sympathetic to that book publisher person, although she missed her point – free speech can be controlled if public harm is done (the old “shouting fire in a theatre” argument); that is not what is at issue here – if something is illegal, then go after the perpetrators; don’t censor everyone else.

There’s a fundamental inversion of liberty when you can say that you will punish or regulate evryone for the actions that may be taken by some criminal element. It’s like saying that because some people drive drunk, we will put mandatory breathalysers in every car for all drivers.